【會員投票 🇵🇸】 巴勒斯坦國
Added 2025-08-13 17:01:07 +0000 UTC英國、法國考慮承認巴勒斯坦國，用來向以色列在加沙戰爭帶來的人道災難施壓。你認為西方國家應該承認巴勒斯坦國嗎？
Comments
加沙兒童受苦難已經太多，以色列有美國支持，美國與中國作對，就代表香港「黃絲」要支持以色列?以色列也是行國家恐怖主義，Pager attack幾多人斷手指失明。希望早日結束戰爭。我支持兩國方案，但是由巴勒斯坦權力機構，我也不支持哈馬斯
Muhammad Singh
2025-08-14 01:08:41 +0000 UTC比佢立囉，到時咪又係依斯蘭國翻版。佢哋唔會多謝西方，只會靠攏中俄。因為嗰邊無錢。
Doctor Manhattan
2025-08-13 23:30:43 +0000 UTC真的不明白和理解因為加沙人道危機，英國打算承認 巴勒斯坦國。人質呢？
miuying yu
2025-08-13 21:59:20 +0000 UTC完全睇唔到有任何方法可以阻止呢場長年嘅悲劇
Brian Leung
2025-08-13 21:45:51 +0000 UTCUnconditional recognition of a Palestinian state will not establish a functioning government capable of self-governance or self-defense, nor will it address Gaza’s immediate humanitarian crisis or secure its borders. Without Israel’s agreement —impeded by Hamas’s refusal to disarm and its persistent threats against its people, aligned with American strategic priorities—such recognition is not only mere castles in the air but further risks entrenching Palestinian advocates of violence and Israeli opponents of statehood. A more effective approach, recently suggested by former Secretary of State Anthony Blinken in the WSJ, seems to be available. France, the UK, Canada, and Australia should adopt, and the US should support, a time-bound, conditions-based framework for recognizing a Palestinian state. This must include clear start and end points to avoid an open-ended process. Palestinians require a defined timeline for achieving self-governance, paired with commitments to ensure Israel’s security, fostering mutual trust and progress toward statehood. Any unconditional and unconstrained efforts to promptly alleviate the suffering of the Palestinian people would only let Hamas bide its time to take up the reins of Gaza again. Sadly, the above suggestion is more akin to rainbows and unicorns. The October 7 attacks have emboldened Netanyahu to advance his long-simmering objectives: thwarting any prospects for the creation of a Palestinian state and expanding Israel's security buffer zone, if not its de facto borders, through a shift from the mere presence of settlements to outright occupation. Very few would hold out hope that Netanyahu and hawkish officials show little willingness to engage a Palestinian authority influenced by the deadly enemy Hamas. By continuing on the current course, Hamas has limited options, especially given that Netanyahu’s strategy likely presumes all hostages might have been dead in a bid to eliminate all Hamas militants. He and his right-wing cabinet now appear to calculate the costs of indefinite “colonial occupation” of Gaza, which risks embroiling their nation in a guerrilla warfare: the significant expenses of military presence and humanitarian aid, potential casualties from insurgency, strong opposition at home, and its relations with the West and Arab states. If politics fails to deliver any viable solutions, perhaps a disruptive idea— rebuilding Gaza as a resort—proposed by Trump is a way out of the plight.
George
2025-08-13 19:01:09 +0000 UTC不如叫英法救返人質出嚟同保證以色列人不再受恐襲傷害先吖。
CK
2025-08-13 17:54:43 +0000 UTC反而想請教，承認與不承認其實有什麼分別？台灣都冇人承認又如何？
Bryan Chan
2025-08-13 17:45:08 +0000 UTC我唔反對承認巴勒斯坦國地位。但前提係如上面朋友所言，係承認邊一派先？約旦河西岸嘅法塔克定加沙嘅哈馬斯先。如果兩邊都承認，咁咪助長咗哈馬斯嘅恐怖主義啦喎，咁擺明同內塔尼亞胡過唔去噃。 再者，我比較Concern 佢哋以承認巴勒斯坦去逼內塔尼亞胡收手。但問題係今鋪係哈馬斯發動襲擊先。
Cyrus Lee
2025-08-13 17:21:46 +0000 UTC咁係咪以色列永久停火就唔再支持或承認巴勒斯坦國或者巴勒斯坦自治政府？
Kenny Cheung
2025-08-13 17:14:24 +0000 UTC其實我都唔知佢地想承認邊個政府 約旦河西岸定加沙？ Btw 西方國家絕對不應該reward 哈馬斯發動攻擊 不過其實而家幾個政府都係想攞回教徒票，邊有原則，所以都係無得救
Kirishima
2025-08-13 17:07:18 +0000 UTC
