SamSuka
law

law

patreon


law activity

TTTBE #53: Early Answer for Patrons

Hey, Patreon may be in the midst of screwing over its customers, but we're still cranking out exclusive content just for you BECAUSE WE LOVE YOU.

This question asked whether a witness can be compelled to answer a question on cross-examination relating to whether he falsified tax returns, even if t...

View Post

OA128: Antitrust, Part Two

Today's episode concludes the discussion begun in Episode 125 about antitrust law in light of the proposed AT&T/Time Warner merger.

First, though, we begin with some news items, including an up...

View Post

Patron QnA4!

We're on YouTube this time because the other service wanted to charge an arm and a leg..

View Post

OA127: Special Edition - What Michael Flynn's Plea Deal Means (w/guest Randall Eliason)

Today's special episode tackles the breaking news that Gen. Michael Flynn has pled guilty in connection with the Mueller investigation.  To break down the significance of...

View Post

TTTBE #52: Early Answer for Patrons!

This question asked whether Congress has the constitutional power to tax something (in this case, cigarettes) and then earmark the funding to discourage citizens from using that same product.

The answer is "yes."  And, in fact, Thomas managed to get this one correct, too, by picking the right...

View Post

OA126: Mick Mulvaney & The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Today's episode breaks down the recent kerfuffle over the simultaneous claims of Leandra English and Mick Mulvaney to be Acting Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

First, we begin with an "Andrew Was Wrong (?)" segment that gives voice to an anti-Net Neutrality argument, a...

View Post

Law'd Awful Movies #13: Meet Your Strawman

This month, we're reviewing.... whatever the hell this is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7QeMZ6xgoo

Unlock your potential limitless (meaning either $650k or a billion or something) worth!

View Post

OA125: Net Neutrality and Antitrust, Part One

Today's episode takes two deep dives into complicated legal issues in the news.

First, we tackle the FCC's recent "Order Restoring Internet Freedom," which is being characte...

View Post

OA124: Happy Thanksgiving!

Today's episode is the Happiest Episode Ever (TM)!

First, the guys discuss "the real meaning of Thanksgiving," cribbing from a blog post Andrew wrote for his old firm back in 2013.

In the mai...

View Post

Happy Thanksgiving & Show Intro Quotes

Happy Thanksgiving from all of us here at Opening Arguments!

Also -- it's that time again!  That's right, it's time for us to change the show intro quotes.  So, you know the drill:  post audio or video clips here with a time stamp and upvote the ones you like best, ...

View Post

OA123: Cards Against Humanity (And Thomas), "Magic Words" & so much more!

In this fun, pre-Thanksgiving episode, we delve into a number of interesting topics.  We begin with the popular (if much maligned by Thomas) card game "Cards Against Humanity" and their pitch to " View Post

OA122: Moore is Less

Today's episode is, unfortunately, all about Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore.

First, the guys discuss the unintentionally hilarious litigation hold letter filed by Moore's attorney.  After that, Andrew and Thomas break down Alabama's election laws and discuss a variety of proposals being c...

View Post

OA121: A Theory of Justice and the Social Contract (w/guest Aaron Rabi of Embrace the Void)

Today's episode takes a deep dive into social contract theory, and in particular, one of the most influential works of modern philosophy, John Rawls's A Theory of Justice, with guest philosopher Aaron Rabi, host of the terrific podcast 2017-11-13 23:53:09 +0000 UTC View Post

OA120: OA Shills For Monsanto! (w/guest Natalie Newell of "Science Moms")

Today's episode features Natalie Newell of the documentary "Science Moms" discussing GMO labeling and science awareness.

First, we begin with an "Andrew Was Wrong" segment that updates some previous stories, including good news from the Jane Doe v. Wright decision discussed in View Post

OA119: Trump's Trans Ban (& More)

Today's episode takes a look at the recent decision in Doe v. Trump in which a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction blocking the majority of President Trump's ban on trans servicemembers in the armed forces.

First, though, we begin with a discussion of 2017-11-06 22:54:08 +0000 UTC View Post

TTTBE #48: Early Answer for Patrons!

This was a pretty straightforward question about when a co-conspirator's statements are independently admissible (apart from having the co-conspirator testify, of course).  This is another exception-to-the-hearsay-rules question.

Thomas analyzed this question exactly correctly in order to arr...

View Post

Law'd Awful Movies #12: Body of Evidence

With special guest Mark from How-To Heretic! Warning: This movie was far more pornographic than any of us expected...

View Post

OA118: Indictment Monday & the View From Yodel Mountain

Today's rapid-response episode tackles -- of course -- the indictment of former Donald Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and his protege, Rick Gates, as well as the guilty plea entered by Trump campaign official George Papadopoulos.  What does it all mean?  Listen to a special full-leng...

View Post

OA117: Restricting Abortion Rights (& a Deep Dive into Res Judicata)

Today's episode takes a look at a tragic case currently unfolding of a pregnant young woman being detained for being in this country illegally and the Trump administration's efforts to deny her the right to an abortion.

We begin with a quick procedural update on the 9th Circuit's ruling on EO-2 be...

View Post

Bonus on Serial!

Andrew sat down with listener Michael Rops for some bonus time on Serial and Undisclosed!

This will take the place of the QnA for this month.

View Post

TTTBE #47: Early Answer for Patrons!

This question asked whether landlords generally have immunity from suit from their tenants.  Most people properly assumed that no, they don't.  But -- as always with the bar exam -- the real question is "why?"

So we can eliminate both "C" and "D" right off the bat.  Answer "C" says ...

View Post

OA116: Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump & The Russians - Election Law (w/guest Beth Kingsley)

Today's rapid-response episode tackles the recent news that Hillary Clinton's campaign and/or the DNC paid for the "Russian dossier" on Donald Trump.  What does that mean in terms of U.S. election law?  Listen and find out!

We begin with a quick news update on various lawsuits against po...

View Post

OA115: Colin Kaepernick's Grievance Against the NFL (Featuring Chris Kluwe)

 

Today's episode features former NFL punter, social justice advocate, and game designer Chris Kluwe, who sued his former NFL team for wrongful termination after he alleged that they cut him for standing up for marriage equality...

View Post

TTTBE #46: Early Answer for Patrons

As some of you pointed out, I screwed up and repeated a prior question.  Yes, the answer was "C" -- prenuptial agreements must be in writing to be enforceable.

Consider this a freebie for our attentive listeners and for Thomas, who's now 26-for-46 (56.5%).

View Post

OA114: Presidential Powers - Obamacare and the Travel Ban

Today's rapid-response episode begins with an update on the Allergan patent licensing scheme discussed in Episode 107.  What does a federal judge think of this One Weird Trick to avoid...

View Post

OA 113: Our Cruel & Unusual Podcast Heads to International Waters

Today's episode is entirely Trump-free, and features a deep dive into the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the 8th Amendment.

We begin, however, with a great listener question from Captain Patrick Dobbins, who wants to know the ins and outs of "international waters."  Ask, and ye shall ...

View Post

TTTBE #45: Early Answer for Patrons!

This question asked whether a state could arbitrarily revoke the license for a massage parlor simply because some unsavory activities take place at other massage parlors.  The key fact in the question was this:  "The only procedure provided was a letter from the city declaring...

View Post

OA112: Who's Afraid of the FCC?

Today's rapid-response episode begins with a discussion of a recent petition to the Supreme Court for certiorari filed in Evans v. Georgia Regional Hospital, and in particular, an amicus curiae brief submitted by 76 employers.  How does this brief affect the...

View Post

Submit your questions for the show!

Thread for user questions.  Feel free to resubmit any that you have sent in the past & we haven't answered.  And please do vote up the questions you'd like to hear answered on the show!

View Post

OA111: Andrew Seidel Returns!

Today's episode marks the triumphant return of attorney Andrew Seidel of the Freedom From Religion Foundation to the show!

We begin with an "Andrew Was Wrong" segment in which patron Kristen Hansen discusses how better to evaluate charities...

View Post