Why I Will Never Use Pitcher W/L Records
Added 2020-07-23 14:18:25 +0000 UTCWith baseball officially kicking off I wanted to give a brief explanation on why you will never see pitcher win/loss records as part of my decodes and I suggest you get away from using them as well.
Examples:
Gerrit Cole - - Has 192 starts, his overall w/l record is 94-52.......
You see, Gerrit Cole has started 192 MLB games, however, out of the 192 games, he has only posted a w/l stat for 146 of those games. That means, 24% of the time during Gerrit Coles's career when he starts a game, he doesn't actually post a win or a loss.
Max Scherzer - - Has 356 starts, his overall w/l record is 170-89.......
You see, Max Scherzer has started 356 MLB games, however, out of the 356 games, he has only posted a w/l stat for 259 of those games. That means, 28% of the time during Max Scherzer's career when he starts a game, he doesn't actually post a win or a loss.
Johnny Cueto - - Has 296 starts, his overall w/l record is 126-87......
You see, Johnny Cueto has started 296 MLB games, however, out of the 296 games, he has only posted a w/l stat for 213 of those games. That means, 29% of the time during Johnny Cueto's career when he starts a game, he doesn't actually post a win or a loss.
Clayton Kershaw - - Has 344 starts, his overall w/l record is 169-74......
You see, Clayton Kershaw has started 344 MLB games, however, out of the 344 games, he has only posted a w/l stat for 243 of those games. That means, 30% of the time during Clayton Kewshaw's career when he starts a game, he doesn't actually post a win or a loss.
Conclusion: Based on the examples given for just the 2 MLB games that are being played today, the starting pitchers for each of the four teams have inconsistency with their overall win-loss record in comparison to how many games they have actually started. Basing my decode decision and using pitcher MLB win-loss stats knowing the % error in pitchers not actually recording a win/loss would be irresponsible decoding and by default, resulting in more potential sports picking loss than deemed necessary. There are plenty of other stats and numbers you can use to come to a final decision without having to involve a stat that already has a built-in error of 20-30% inefficiency.
Comments
I wish you the best my brother
RUNITUPPP
2020-07-23 21:47:25 +0000 UTCSpeaking the truth makes me 'mad'? Glad you found comedy in that post. People in this community seem to think scripts change everyday when their picks are wrong, because of 'money bet'.
Jason
2020-07-23 21:45:36 +0000 UTCBro why you so mad ^ lol
RUNITUPPP
2020-07-23 21:21:01 +0000 UTCjust posted
My Sports Gematria
2020-07-23 19:15:49 +0000 UTCThe Eagles scored 41 points in their Super Bowl win in Minnesota. 2 years prior to Kobe Bryant dying at 41 years old, born in Philadelphia, in Minnesota. where the Lakers were founded. Your telling me a random meaningless joe blow has the ability to change the course of history, lets say because he bet 100k on the Eagles to score exactly 41 points, netting 10 million? They'd make 10 of those joe blow bettors millionaire's before even thinking about changing a script. Super Bowl 60, has their winner and score set in stone. No money will change the course of history. At the end of the day, remember, money is printed paper, which the elite control. History stays.
Jason
2020-07-23 19:12:27 +0000 UTCI wish i could like this post 100 times above mine. Kill me when i see people saying 'flipped the scripted", checking "too much money on this team", 'changed outcome". Such a poor excuse. So in their eyes, a person betting too much money on Tiger Woods to win the Masters last April, would of caused the PGA Tour, the day before the Masters, to change their outcome, change their history, change their ritual, change Tiger Woods entire career, all because of "money bet in Las Vegas". Utter blasmophy. These riddles and ritual are set so far in advance, to hit the exact marks, no 'bet" in the world will change the course of history riding on these events.
Jason
2020-07-23 19:09:09 +0000 UTCAre you posting today’s picks soon?
Kyle
2020-07-23 18:29:00 +0000 UTCI understand what you are saying and I would have to disagree. I do this work solely based on the fundamental idea that all games are scripted and predetermined by ritual. No occult ritual changes last minute just because of lopsided money, assuming it is a ritual. If outcomes change based on lopsided money, then professional sports aren't actually scripted at all by gematria. The careers of players that gematria gurus express so heavily that have had their career stats scripted their entire life goes at the window once you introduce the idea of an outcome being determined by lopsided money vs gematria occult ritual. Vegas has been around for many many many years..... they won't go out of business nor will they lose money by letting a favorite win. Vegas has many avenues for making money, and for something like this, a high profile game, if the favorite does win it won't bust the banks of vegas because they will still won plenty of money from prop bets, side bets, inning bets, run line, etc etc....
My Sports Gematria
2020-07-23 16:54:41 +0000 UTCAhh that sucks i might just wait for NBA then.
Numeric Eyes
2020-07-23 16:54:23 +0000 UTCHey msg , I’m leaning towards nationals Tonight. It’s fitting that Anthony fauci is throwing out the first pitch while his name equals 56, while max sherzer is the starter tonight with a name also of 56. And another reason I’m leaning Washington is because literally everyone is on the Yankees. And if noticed even when you have a perfect decode right , if the books have a chance to win, I feel like for the most part they throw the gematria out the way and go for the money . What do you think ? Example the Phillies a couple days ago , great gematria for them to win but everyone was on them I feel as if it may caused them to loose do you get me
RUNITUPPP
2020-07-23 16:45:02 +0000 UTCbaseball reference makes you now pay 8$ for stathead which has the h2h records. I use mcube but people have pointed out my h2h for the Yankees and Nationals game is wrong. However, when those people provide me with their website they use to stats, the h2h for the Dodgers and Giants is wrong on those sites so idk... I don't think there actually is a reliable source for h2h, at least for MLB right now
My Sports Gematria
2020-07-23 16:36:49 +0000 UTCWhat website has the MLB head to head records for each team? for some reason i cant find it on baseball reference.
Numeric Eyes
2020-07-23 16:21:53 +0000 UTCMLB is so Masonic if you ever seen that guy on youtube who DVR'd the Cubs vs Brewers on WGN. All of a sudden those symbols appear on the screen. You can tell the commentators are secretly talking about masonry and masons in response to the chicago station being taken over from some where. Skaggs last year was murdered for sure. Blamed on drugs in a hotel room. Numbers added up so perfectly it was undeniable. If someone dies again this season maybe I will hit total runs on the head again. Was disturbing to be right with 9 runs exactly in that series but it was the right answer. 9 to 33 runs total.
Todd Mcateer
2020-07-23 16:02:13 +0000 UTCThat is smart. Maybe that's where zach always goes wrong lmfao! Last year he said Seattle would win world series in March. Then changed teams to Yankees vs Dodgers because of the blackout in NYC. Then he was completely lost. When Washington won he said he had it all right from start to finish lol. What a joker. So happy to be on a guy's patreon who knows what he is doing with no constant lies. Fauci Corona ritual tonight on the first pitch. Im gonna have my eye on him like Kramers land lord with Newman. See if he does the Masonic Hidden hand gesture like he did when introduced at the white house April 4th. See if he does it while on the mound. I bet he would skip it in. He can't have much of an arm. The guy is a goof everyone is looking up to and are told to listen to. The guy who predicted this shit.
Todd Mcateer
2020-07-23 15:45:08 +0000 UTC
