�評上評🇺🇸】美國外交大�，為何大罵��奧��冷戰宣言？

appeasement policy vs engagement policy 有何��？

Flyerman

appeasement policy 和 engagement policy 有什�

Flyerman

人有，但正如六國人�輩出，還是兵敗如山倒。

Dennis Ng

從歷�的角度看，Haass的第五點看似忘記了1995年大陸�臺的�事演習和試射飛彈，以�1996年「劉連昆案�而導致美國派�尼米茲號��立號航空�艦�近臺海。

Just a small potato

I agreed with you on the point people might take a negative view on Haass's article. There are many valid points. However, point 5 (憂慮中國擴張主義並沒有根據) that I could not agree with. Perhaps, China might not take the military approach, but they are definitely taking the擴張主義 approach. We can see by many of the examples including: AIIB (亞洲基礎設施投資銀行), Taiwan’s election, and一帶一路 and else. Back to the point that is Trump the right person or does he has the ability to bring down CCP. I don't think so ; he is very good at demolishing structures and not play by the books. But his concern would only be US, which we haven’t seen any success yet. I believe that is one of the reasons (not play by the book) why many HK ppl favor him to continue his presidency. In addition, in the past democrat’s approach on China-US relation had a bad influence on Biden’s image on this matter However, he still hasn't show any ability to reconstructed, no matter on the issues of domestic unity, economy, or even health care structure.

Jacky Fung

Haaas始終係一個�人，今時今日仲出兵打仗？�人家就退休算數啦

Norm Yuen

People seem to take a very negative view to Haass. I think there are a lot of things he mentioned that are valid, which is also my issue with Trump: TPP, bringing down allies, Trump's own autocratic leanings. Etc. I think a lot HK and TW folks think that Trump and Pompeo can bring down CCP, unfortunately it's very far from the truth. The continual pressure is a long game, and Prof Shen said it best last article that Pompeo is effectively paving the way to have Biden moderate his way into a more enduring and coordinated pressure campaign. I think Haass' point stands though that if you bare your fangs in intl relations, you'd better be sure you can back it up back home. But also on the other end he's obviously trying to protect his own legacy... That part I'm much more ambivalent about.

Wis

作為被中共蹂躪嘅香港人，我好�憾佢�以�大言�慚話中共近年冇從事擴張主義 用出兵打仗��事擴張實力嘅唯一標準會唔會太狹窄？中共嘅�事�嚇頻�，�費�備�斷��，真係隨時亮�，美國�論作為自由世界其中一員，抑或全�大國，如何能夠姑�養奸呢？ �講，除咗�事之外，中共無論喺科技�教育�經濟都滲�晒，�為 ticktock 研究資金 一帶一路......

Napoléon

�議�士把此篇文章譯�英文投稿Washington Post�

Chan Wai Bun

其實Haass大大佢係咪仲用幾�年�嘅眼光�中共？ 佢其實�唔�到已經無“�俄�共�嘅本錢�空間？ �於王上嘅戰狼外交，唔通仲用engagement policy嚟應�？？ 真心唔明呀～教授？？？？？？？

K�白

Haass 唔係 pointless，但單邊主義�唔係出自 Pompeo(有錯請指正)，Pompeo 今次講話正正係修正主義。�人家�出二三�年�既�範，�無視�今中國�顛覆西方文明嘅狼�野心。人地已經係張牙舞爪嘅�虎，而你仲�當佢係野性未純嘅�貓，真係俾人食左都仲矇下矇下。

Gary Lee

北韓阿富汗�窮國際影響力�細,美國比較容易約制。 Can't compare them to China

ML

I thought Haass’s arguments were valid, especially point 6 and 7. We definitely have to look at the clashes between protestors and police (or equivalent security forces) current situation in a number of US cities. I always think that Trump and XJP are two sides of the same coin. However, Haass seemed to fail to grasp the dynamic nature of geopolitics accelerated by the pandemic, and how China is disingenuously exploiting the situation, especially failure of containing the outbreak in the US, in order achieve global hegemony.

Jon T

�完呢篇文章，感覺係美�外交和國際關係上，實在有太多精英存在，�觀中共在呢方�真係完全無人���，無論美國內部�中國用那種手段，明顯方�統一一致，已把中共視為�消滅既敵人，�係用那種手段而已。中交�在外交謀略上�抗明顯係無得比，美國�以領導世界真係有佢既優勢。

wai leung

��美國的民主��（�）之處，正是�以發出��於大領導的�音�有�國際關係學者所講的亦�有其中�部份有點商榷

Bruno Costa

��外擴張，但在全世界範�大打超�戰���醒來總會被��民粹�次充滿世界

Bruno Costa

The discrepancy between Pompeo and Haass is the means to combat China. Could professor shares some views regarding the prosperity of the means Haass mentioned in the article? Why didn't trump administration implement the policy purposed by Haass?

Jay Xie

No one should blame the US for over preparing. People only blame you for under preparing.

twitter�中國通個個都罵pompeo 痴左線 罵侵�早�死自己

Paul Lam

Have you thought about writing an opinion piece for the Washington Post to state the points above?

教授近來真係好高產

THY

第二點，中國的內政并�美國�以解決。 我想說，中共內政的��殘暴，�人性，�自由，�人權今日已經�但��發生在中國內地，�香港這一個本來自由的城市無底線的��難�這些政客毫無感覺？今次如果世界��轉彎，下一個就是���海。 倪匡先生說，共產黨無互信，它的DNA 是��自利，自由與天賦人權是中共政權的天敵，夸張說，�是中共滅就是自由世界�早淪陷。 今日，囯內官僚資本主義已經是發展到極點，貧富懸殊相信已經超越資本主義世界的��範�，人權自由天生被�奪，有很多人甚至�知�人原本是有�利的，人��難�日發生�是�而�報。 今日如果它�被美國養大，�會是一�更兇狠的狼或者�虎

JulieChow皮蛋瘦肉粥

Henry Kissinger 的基金會�中資金�機構(their offices are in the same building in NYC)�年幾百�美元的供養for decades. �逢中美之間有磨擦，就把這尊已經97歲的人形立牌�出來�照。世界變得這麼快，這��人家真的應該好好退出舞�，以�晚節�� 如果有興趣，�以去YouTube 上找一下 LeLe Farley 看看，我相信此人�US younger generation 的影響力很快超�Henry Kissinger & Gangs

Cathy Chang

Haass 係�實主義�學者派， Pompeo 係實戰派？中情局背景更令佢了解中國既�脅？ 🤔prof, ��多加探討2人背景，分�下？

JY

其實Trump一開始都係�實主義掛帥， 當時�係好單純想傾trade deal，亦都有�基辛格攞�見， 但係隨著新疆，��，香港，�海，肺炎�題續步發酵，甚至�程度上Trump內閣一開始都係�到國會壓力，被國會lead�先越趨強硬，Pompeo個發言�係上述事件既�果。 嗰�教授嘅論點其實�幾�年嚟engagement policy一脈相承完全冇變化但係事實都證明呢一個策略�於中國嚟講係完全冇效。 我覺得喺大��呢幾個月就係關�，如果Trump用盡所有手段,�使之後民主黨之後上�亦都冇能力返去以往政策，特別係五眼日��家似乎都唔�考慮美國�屆�題大舉�中共出擊。 Biden有冇膽�短期�一次逆轉剛歸邊國際格局？到時就輪到Biden出賣盟�了。

NewOrder11

所以變數還是11月，�佩奧去留，決定目�路線的走�，也�能是世界最後一次�擇。之後，��八年，世界的格局已經��相�，��逆轉。

salt water

就是�往數�年有 Haass 這類書呆��活在�想國象牙塔裡的�師影響了白宮，�讓中共暗暗明明擴張滲�，弄到今天這個境地。美國今天夢醒還未算太�，若給中共多五至�年時間，到時自由世界會給中共�制到甚麼程度，真的�敢想�。

arrow1818

�係好似當年二戰��粹德�打到去自己屋�樓下先知死�，到�既情�就已經太�了

��想後