Do you want a separate package for older animations and newest animations??
Added 2019-04-07 00:52:24 +0000 UTCSometimes it is very tedious to disable old animations because they do not have the same quality. The most of time I just want to play with the best animations/sequences. So the question is simple... Do you want to have a separate package for the old animations of the newest ones?
There would be a "new classic" package and an old one. And a "new DF" package and an old one. Do you think it's functional?
Comments
Mike, to answer your specific question, "Is it functional?" I would have to say yes it's sounds functional. Having a cleaner and more sorted animation list would help. But, at the same time, if this is a tedious process to bring to the table, then I would rather see you working on more "amazing" content. Just when I thought I have seen your best work, you put something else incredible out there. So, whichever is easier for you, I would say go with that.
Obi
2019-04-09 04:21:03 +0000 UTCChange the names is something more difficult, it's a titacnic's task. But at least, the best option (IMO) is to have only the best animators installed and the best sequences.
Mike24
2019-04-08 21:23:57 +0000 UTCNot just you, but al animators- It would be great if we had a date on them somewhere or a number sequence. It confuses a lot of people to have the same name, just sayin.
instantmagic
2019-04-08 18:58:40 +0000 UTCThx! .=)
Mike24
2019-04-07 22:12:46 +0000 UTCwhatever is easier for you, no complaints on my end! :)
Sportsfoodie4
2019-04-07 19:52:34 +0000 UTCno problem
Joel Saad
2019-04-07 07:04:41 +0000 UTCI don't mind, but I went with "yes" - if it's easier for you then by all means!
hallie
2019-04-07 00:55:11 +0000 UTC
