PATREON EXCLUSIVE (Full Video): The dual personalities of women (Hoe & Housewife)
Added 2024-04-01 12:00:10 +0000 UTC
Comments
Yep, that is pretty accurate re S vs A.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-04-06 10:42:35 +0000 UTCGreat advice from Eric, fully agree. Best of luck with her!
RhodiumMaiden
2024-04-06 10:37:59 +0000 UTC@Lawrence I agree, you can’t be both. But I’m sure many women delude themselves otherwise.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-04-06 10:35:48 +0000 UTC@Eric The effects of body count are the same on men, just slightly less (i.e. higher chance of happiness with more partners). The curves are the same, the male curve is just above the female, essentially parallel. The difference is substantial but not huge. Promiscuity damages both sexes.
RhodiumMaiden
2024-04-06 10:34:20 +0000 UTC"The Feminine mind taken to the extreme is schizophrenia, while the Masculine mind taken to the extreme is autism." I LIKE that! It certainly captures the essence, if not the complete precision.
Joseph Omega
2024-04-03 02:25:50 +0000 UTCUnderstandably Alexander would have a LOT of pushback on the last point he was trying to make: The idea of a "double standard" on body count is a misnomer and just serves as an excuse for women to not face their own nature. It is better said that there is just ONE standard with TWO sides--one side for women and one side for men on the basis of, not just their natures, but ALSO their expectations (as perceived by BOTH sides). Men AND women BOTH hold a woman with "high body count" in lower regard and of lower sexual value, while men AND women BOTH hold a man with "high body count" in higher regard and of higher sexual value. This is evideced by the ENORMOUS success ESPECIALLY AMONG WOMEN of such movies like "100 Shades of Gray" and "365 Days" and the VAST liturature of "Romance Novels" going back very many decades (if not centuries), where the young naive innocent woman is seduced by the older worldly wise man. A SINGLE (not double) standard, with TWO DISTINCT sides that BOTH sides agree on.
Joseph Omega
2024-04-03 02:10:36 +0000 UTCWe do not fundamentally change personalities and habits without a lot of work. So, no. I don’t believe people can change in this way. We do evolve in terms of accumulated wisdom which can affect our behaviors to some degree. I’ll give it that much. So perhaps a promiscuous women will realize her mistakes and change. But if she still has the underlying insecurities, nope. Whichever man gets with her had better vet carefully to prevent being cheated on at some point.
Lawrence
2024-04-02 21:35:57 +0000 UTCGood episode. Very important topic.
Alexander Knight
2024-04-02 18:36:11 +0000 UTCWomen have a harder time giving up their hoe phase. Men with a high body count or promiscuous past are usually able to settle down in a monogamous relationship later in life easier. It’s not fair. It’s just biology.
Eric Linden
2024-04-02 14:50:52 +0000 UTCWhen was the last time I heard that a girl wanted children in the future 😂 More seriously it does happen and I do come from a country with an abysmal fertility rate, but I will say at least a third of girls don't want family nowadays. BTW Once I heard the take that the feminine mind took to the extreme is schizophrenia. Check out. The male equivalent is autism.
Cezary Skoczek
2024-04-02 04:47:44 +0000 UTCI did put but was always looking for long term.
Alexander Grace
2024-04-01 22:04:02 +0000 UTCDon’t overshare, but don’t undershare either. Whatever you do, don’t lie. If she is content right now, you don’t need to bring it up. When she inevitably does ask, ask how much she wants to know. She will tell you how much detail she wants. She, like you, mainly wants to be reassured every now and then that you are being honest.
Eric Linden
2024-04-01 21:48:41 +0000 UTCI genuinely wonder about your own past (Alex). Were you not into pick-up artistry when younger? Did it not translate into promiscuity before you actually met your partner in life? Not poking, just asking.
Olivier
2024-04-01 21:47:42 +0000 UTCThis hit home a little bit. After a very unhealthy relationship in my early 20s. (Where she went out and cheated a lot) I in turn had very low self esteem and felt like I needed to get my number up, so that I’d be desirable to women, and also get validation that women did find me attractive sexually, since my ex cheated on me so much, making me feel like I wasn’t desirable sexually. After 5 months of intentional no sex, I met an amazing girl, with zero body count, never went on a date, 29, modest, and believes in saving herself for a man who will marry her, (housewife) (met in person at a church I started attending, (I’m religious) she’s very high quality with personal growth, accountability, character qualities, and also shows genuine attraction and interest. She did ask me about my past, and I gave her a kinda vague overview. She didn’t ask anything specific, but I did tell her how I grew, and not that I changed. Should I wait till she asks for clarification? Or just leave it at that? She seemed satisfied, with my answer and didn’t ask follow up questions,
Samuel Oliver
2024-04-01 20:18:04 +0000 UTCIt’s inevitable that people change over time. Are you the same person, in all aspects, as you were earlier in life?
Kevin Pereira
2024-04-01 17:29:17 +0000 UTCI don’t agree with Alexander on this. Healthy Women don’t have dual personalities. They are and always be one and the same. Once a hoe always a hoe. The reasons and insecurities she had when younger don’t just vanish when she’s older unless she does a lot of work on herself.
Lawrence
2024-04-01 16:22:13 +0000 UTCA person’s values are determined by the influences around them. For young people today, that is social media, the internet, and their peers. In the past, it was their parents, their family, the church, their teachers.
Eric Linden
2024-04-01 13:56:36 +0000 UTCStep 1 - It begins with me. Clean up past emotional debris. Step 2 - Don’t let women try to pull a fast one on me. This includes not participating in conversations where you get taken for a walk around the block. Starting in the friend zone disables a lot of this nonsense.
Mark Bryski
2024-04-01 12:34:44 +0000 UTC
