CRP Patreon Exclusive: “Why CRT, Why Now”

The "all men are created equal in the eyes of God" is referring to the Divine Right of Kings, NOT equality. It means that no man is more fit to rule than the other based on the fact that he was chosen by God, which is making the case for a Republic, not Socialism and Equality. If the founding fathers wanted the USA to be equal, then they wouldn't have given the right to vote exclusively to land owners, because only land owners paid taxes.

You don't know what you're talking about. Latino is absolutely an ethnicity. Ethnic groups share common linguistic, cultural and physical characteristics. There is no "White", "Black" or "Asian". Two are a shade and one is a continent. Until very recently the European continent was in a state of perpetual warfare because there were so many ethnic groups in a small geographical area. The situation is still the same in Africa. And "Asian"? Asia is a massive continent. Chinese people don't look or sound like Indians and Japanese people are vastly different both physically and culturally from Turks. Race doesn't exist but ethnicity most certainly does.

Just to clarify “Hispanic/Latino” is not a race or ethnicity. You are either European or Middle Eastern which is still White; Black due to African slaves brought to Latin America. Or Asian either brought over as work labour from Asia or you have indigenous Amerindian blood, which is still genetically Asian. Like, I said no such thing as Hispanic/Latino DNA. It is merely a culture and/or a nationality; only if you are born AND raised in the West Indies or Central & South America.

I’m beginning to sense its a separatist movement to carve out certain geographies to become autonomous. The US may fragment like the Balkans. BLM and ANTIFA are as I see it separatist organisations which have the same Marxist background. There are too many factions in the US that think completely differently and are intolerant of other views.

one caveat : I am willing to bet that this CRT was not a result of the equalitarian ideals of the enlightenment but created on purpose by people who hate white people. I wonder who created CRT and what are his or her origins?

Piero San Giorgio

This video is spot on and describes the current racial situation.

Keeping on beating this old, irrelevant dead horse so more preferences and entitlements can be extorted from guilt infected white masochists?

I think it is all part of keeping us fighting so the owners of the Federal Reserve can do what they want with and to our money. Control is the goal, after control is our destruction. I look at the Georgia Guidestones and have to think someone is serious about what they wrote.

You're whitewashing segregation a lot here. Calling segregated appliances that served purely for humiliation "their own institutions" as though they gave black people some sort of power or independence is downright preposterous. Black people were simply bottom-class citizens living in a state run by Anglo-Saxon elites based on the model of British class-society.

Tomek

Coach, i think you are correct about the deliberate attack on socalled whites. just want to point out that your understanding of history regard the enlightment period is not exactly accurate. go on youtube and watch this video for your entry down the rabbit hole: History vol.5: Ben Franklin vs. The Black Germans

Charles Jue

Sorry coach but I think this time you have it all wrong. That all men are created equal never meant, nor understood, that they die equal. It has always been understood it that such thing only occurs at the moment they are created (whenever that happens) so these are not my today's personal lucubration for the sake of writing this comment. It has always been understood that all men are equal at whenever the moment they were created, equal as been equally endowed with their same inalienable rights, that is. That's the way that everybody has understood it. Actually, this is the first time that I see someone mistaking the "created equal" for "remaining equal" per life in all their efforts, abilities, merits and even usefulness to society. Not even babies are considered equal (only in their inalienable rights.) Created equal has never been understood as the Marxist notion of equal rewards to all, despite different merits, efforts, talents and usefulness to society. Marxists have even coined the term “equity” for that, because even they see that “created equal” has never been understood as “created in equity.” So with that, even they are denying you point. According to Jordan Peterson that notion of created equal and that of inalienable rights comes from the Christian notion of been equal to the eyes of god, but even such never-questioned notion has been ever used by anybody to argue that it means equal to the eyes of men, who must punish criminals and reward those who serve society, or the ruling class, well. You have to give the founding fathers more credit than that: had they seen any such trivially contradictory interpretation, as you say you see now, they would have never taken it as a foundational principle, very beautiful indeed. The inalienable rights seem to have its predecessor in the early Spanish conquest of the Americas (Francisco de Vitoria, etc.) This video mentions something about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t918VibrmI8 Please, revise your views on this regard before your webinar this Sunday.

First, thanks for making videos and thanks for the history lesson on America, I didn’t know it was segregated, that’s interesting. Okay, so you got the ending right, but the reasoning wrong. The reason we’re having CRT, and let’s be honest ‘communism’ as a conversation, of the last 100 years really is because of technology. The main thing it has done to accelerate this is banking + being able to print money. This ability has enabled us to follow women’s imperative over men’s. Women’s being equal outcome, men’s being equal opportunity. Which are opposite.

Dave Smith

Some men just want to watch the world burn.

Liberty is the stuff that enables innovation. Innovation is the stuff that fuels high technology. Without Liberty totalitarian systems will always be behind the tech curve. Sure they can 'tweek' present tech to make upgrades, but they will never create new science. They will always need to steal tech from other peoples ~ free peoples.

Coach, I've been thinking about your argument from the Sino-US webinar - that a "no more bullshit" culture is coming. It's spot on IMO, but I think may be coming far sooner with this Covid stuff.

RE: true multiculturalism and following the Martin Luther King model would have worked. * Not agreeing here. But: This would make a super discussion. Uruguay and Paraguay being excellent examples.

😭😭 the ending really sad

Men create, women make babies. Government spends money on R&D, only when it must. Most all of the great achievements (tech, science, arts and the rest) come from Men. Always will.

Francis Marion, subject of M.Gibson movie 'The Patriot', was not involved in the A.R. until circumstances became unbearable. The US is full of such people. They are asleep. They will either; wake up Or die.

Under carefully controlled laboratory conditions organisms will be have as they dam well please . VS . . Give me the little children when they are young, I will make them N * * * s for life. The conundrum: you can lead people into slavery/serfdom/socialism/feudalism . . and some will stay. Others will escape.

when the economy collapses people will stick to their own

Great video, but why do you think it's so female led both in government and academics?

If racism is bad because it dehumanizes people, then racism against white people is clearly wrong. It should be self-evident but when I tell some English friends this, their reaction is perverse, and they feel some weird white guilt. I believe my perspective is no different to the White people who went against their self-interest and protested apartheid South Africa. Funny thing is talking to young people and seeing how brain washed they are. I went to private school in the UK and I’m British-Indian and I was talking to this white girl from a working-class background in a pub. Initially she felt that her people oppressed me until I told her my background and that the British freed India from Islamic oppression. The CRT brigade are too stupid and corrupt to see that making society tribal will have dire consequences.

Wow, solid video coach. I had an intuitive understanding of this topic since i’m living here in the US. But this sets things very clearly on the spectrum on the topic of egalitarianism.

Well said Coach, true multiculturalism and following the Martin Luther King model would have worked. Instead, we are following the worst of Malcom X (who later renounced this method). The enlightenment liberal project works if we focussed on class and culture. Those of Christian African heritage and Indians do very well in the USA when they follow the system, don’t commit crime, get married have kids, get educated and work in the corporate system or start a business. The worst outcomes are Inner cities blacks and whites in Appalachian. But that goes against the corporate elite economic interests and the "liberal" socialist agenda. There is money and power to be made in CRT.

Why now? IMO: 1. To beat up rightwing populism 2. Reinvigorate the slipping black vote 3. Deflect from Democrat mismanagement (NYC, Minneapolis) 4. Chinafication 5. Pivot from lopsided urban development

Great video coach. Hope the webinar will touch on the specific ethnoreligious groups that are pushing CRT, Bolshevism, and Woke Culture on the West......and more importantly, Why they're pushing it

Leninists have been infiltrated world wide since the beginning of the 20th century. US is not an exception. There's a very good book called "History of Chinese secret services" by a french guy that I forgot his name that talks about this. Propaganda has been pushed in Universities since the 60's. The funny thing is that Russia tried to take over China with Marxist ideology and ended up training the comunist leaders of today's China. With Russia and China being allies and the US slowly cow towing to China on one part (see how China is trapping foreign intelectual property and assets) and antagonizing it on the other the next few years will either bring us to a sort of uneasy socialist world community or a hardening of imperialistic borders. Just my opinion based on personal research of modus operandi of each state.

Looking forward to the webinar. There's a reasonably good old video (from the mid 90s) with the military strategist William Lind then with Paul Weyrich's "Free Congress Foundation" discussing "The Origins of Political Correctness" which is a good prep for this topic. It's a bit over 40 minutes and is well worth watching. (Paul Weyrich was one of the few "on the up-and-up" members of the official Conservative Movement, he'd be on the outs if he were alive today. William Lind is still kicking but has been largely pushed to the outer fringes since he, too, is on the up and up instead of being a token/pretend opposition like most of Conservatism, INC). If people have time for books - short ones - the ones by Paul Gottfried like "The Strange Death of Marxism" or (especially) "After Liberalism" are good lead-ins to this topic too.

Porphy's Attorney

LONG LIVE GONZALO!!!!!

Awesome