Added 2016-07-17 08:32:09 +0000 UTC
So, pay-up-front is now available. Basically, when activated, a patron will be charged immediately, rather than at the next cycle. This means they'd get their rewards right away (or as soon as I can manage). It also gives immediate access to any content and posts, rather than having to wait til your payment's approved.
So, what I want to know is--if my account had been 'pay up front' at the time you pledged, would it have influenced your decision to become a patron? Would you have preferred it, or would it have been viewed as an inconvenience?
It's important to note that switching to PUF doesn't affect any current patrons, it'll only affect future ones, and hopefully add a barrier for bots. Additionally, if I switch to PUF, I may have to set a limitation near the end of the month for new patrons, just so I don't get double the amount of requests immediately.
Comments
Waiting is more of an inconvenience than paying up front is, I think. And charge-on-the-1st Patreons tend to lead to confusing, inconsistent delivery of rewards. People who actually plan to pay shouldn't be put off by paying immediately.
MigBird
2016-07-17 09:27:15 +0000 UTC
