Early Access: The Fact Check Administration
Added 2021-08-25 08:08:44 +0000 UTCA follow-up to the last video, wherein I address criticism of my stance.
Comments
Haven't watched, will probably watch later and say nothing about the substance, but I must say the thumbnail is super charitable to your opposition as always. Very classy. I unironically love it
hookshot245
2021-09-01 23:13:28 +0000 UTCCouldn't disagree more. Fucking retarded argument. Scientists aren't incorruptible beings, credentials or not. This would be easily exploited for "the greater good" first chance they get. The vast majority don't have the recourses or time to conduct studies to prove something demonstrably true, or disprove evidence provided, so we'd essentially be at the mercy of whatever this organisation says it true. You're also looking at this through liberal lenses. At this point in time, it's demonstrably true that black ethnic groups are less intelligent on average than white ethnic groups. Does this mean that the fact checkers will be going after everyone who says otherwise? I don't think so and in fact I think they would come up with some wonky cherry-picked data that 'proves' the contrary. What about the gender pay gap that's been a perpetrated lie for years now? Will every liberal politician be forced at gunpoint to correct themselves? Again, no. Ultimately, this organisation would be rejected by a lot of people and you'll probably end up with an incel or religious fanatic killing a bunch of people over it.
John Smith
2021-08-28 17:33:22 +0000 UTCI wish there was some way to simulate putting a program like this into practice and watch the results.
Gary LaForge
2021-08-26 03:17:59 +0000 UTCThe only time it’s illegal to lie is when there’s money involved or in courts
Dylan Whaley
2021-08-26 02:36:01 +0000 UTCTJ is right on this one. Stop being reactionaries. "But what if it doesn't work" OK, well you could say that about anything in existence, it's a non argument.
daniel schmitt
2021-08-26 00:28:39 +0000 UTCSlippery slope arguments are the most useless arguments ever because they can be applied to literally everything. Example, "we can't let women vote, what's next letting cars vote?" The entire basis of a slippery slope argument is "we can't do this thing, because what if this totally other thing."
daniel schmitt
2021-08-26 00:25:01 +0000 UTCTj that would require ppl to think to come up w subjective reasons instead of having their opinions fed to them AND 2nd I have a HUGE fear of needles and was scared to death both times and got both shots for myself, loved ones and society.
Akephalos
2021-08-25 22:09:41 +0000 UTCNot to speak of how many fact checkers there would be needed. And im guessing not enough qualified people to fill the spots, and if there was, not enough of them would be willing to do the job.
Kevin Hansson
2021-08-25 14:28:17 +0000 UTCThis is absolutely a terrible use of the scientist's time. They should be doing actual science instead of rebuking retards. Also, I don't think you'll find many scientists who want to do this job. They went into science because they actually wanted to do SCIENCE.
Maya Balsich
2021-08-25 11:10:40 +0000 UTCI like that you're back to making political videos again
Anders Rosendal
2021-08-25 09:20:44 +0000 UTCIf people are going to listen to some of the misinformation out there, and take it serious without questioning it. It is a loss cause to begin with.
Stang46l
2021-08-25 09:19:25 +0000 UTCIm afraid of government making truth whatever they want it to be and banning any opposition. They already trying to do it in my country. I migh make a video reply.
Złosiej Stępień
2021-08-25 08:53:07 +0000 UTC
