Early access...

United States

G'day from Australia - love the fact that your president appears to be equally fluent from both orifices

Beau I’m going nHalifax, Nova Scotia, Canada and I watch your video’s and promote your channel by contributing and resending out your tube videos. However, I cannot seem to write comments, join in on a chat or get ahold of you. I know you have little time for every subscriber, but could you tell me me your email address and provide help on how to connect with and comment on your video’s when needed? Thank you Geoff a Elliott Ex RCMP who “wrote the book “on Community Based Policing in the RCMP. When the Commissioner of the RCMP called for a return to CBP back in 1988, I did the first training course ever for the RCMP in Lethbridge Alberta. Your latest piece on Policing caught my eye.

This is regarding your recent video referring to "facepalm". I am fascinated with the concept of a "global" community of states. Fact is the corporate globalism is already there, way ahead of the game. Curious about your thoughts on the realities of the corporate world vs. a potential fair and just community...

Beau, your thoughts are rich and expansive. I am constantly thinking of how you could expand your reach to educators, students, and hopefully to those who have stopped learning. Have you considered writing a book or even better a textbook for teaching purposes?

What would the break be for? I think 12-15 minutes is still digestible. Many TED talks are about that long. Many peole realize that the phrase "military industrial complex" was a warning by Eisenhower. Well, at least the people that I am acquainted with knew it was a warning. But I do like calling it what it is: corruption. Just like so many of the three-letter agencies have a revolving sinecure door for retired officers who have zero tradecraft, because they bring "leadership." They try to call it something else, but most of us call 'em as we see 'em.

I would love to hear your thoughts behind the Epstein death, that is if you have any assembled or concluded thoughts on the matter. Thx man.

Why do you feel the need for the "break" in the middle? Personally I think if you feel that a topic warrants a deep dive/long video then make that video, and make it proper. Why have a "bite sized"/"easy to consume" part first which does not really address the issue/get to your point? As a long term viewer i trust your judgement that a long video means something extra important and appreciate it for what it is, and will not need a "teaser"/"up sell" intro to watch the entire thing. Or are you hoping that new/random/dropin viewers will "stumble" across the long format and be hooked in from there? Because for that i think your normal "just a thoughts" are much better suited.

David K

I like this format. Often I'm pressed for time. This way I can get the gist up front. If that's enough info on this topic for me, or I just don't have the time for more, I can choose to stop after the first part. If the topic is important or intriguing for me, I can continue. Great idea!

I like having the option of staying on for clarification and or additional info.

Well, I'm a contrarian, I guess. I prefer shorter formats that are less instructive and more thought provoking. I guess that's why I started watching you in the 1st place. I think this could have, and should have, been done in the 2 obvious parts it was. You are one of the delightful, and refreshingly succinct people on social media. Don't become like others who dilute their messages to make them seem authoritative. You are you and that's good. 2 short messages instead. That's just my thoughts.

I like the format but I think this format clashed with your titles. I know you have stated before that the normal titles are left somewhat ambiguous because you want to draw in viewers other than your subscribers without invoking some sort of prejudice. But this subject seems more targeted to your subscribers so the title is misleading. This video series is not about "the military industrial complex", it is about "how using loaded terms can prejudice someone you are trying to convince of your viewpoint". It would be hard to categorize things from your titles. Perhaps playlist could help with that, or a different title structure for videos aimed at the subscriber base. And as others have said, links to reference material in the description never hurts. Lastly, thank you for being dedicated to this and constantly working on the format. You're a great communicator and I love your content.

Korey Peterson