What do we think about this?
Added 2020-02-14 17:40:51 +0000 UTC
Comments
You won't get the same feel, or effect, with a longer lens. The wide angle, in close, distorts the people as well, exaggerating their facial expressions and response to his 'intrusion' into their space.
Jim Kost
2020-02-15 13:49:56 +0000 UTCI think that’s the answer. You walked around taking photos without considering the people around you. It unethical or invasive because they are not your intended subject. However, this photographer is walking around crossing I front of people with the intention of capturing there image. I get it’s okay to take photos of people in public, but we all need personal space and should be mindful and respectful of that. Also, an 85mm or 70-200mm lens or their equivalent would work amazing. You can capture the similar images from a distance.
2020-02-14 22:38:49 +0000 UTCBut see, that's different to me. When I went to Thailand - I obviously walked around taking pictures of everything all the time. I had multiple conversations with Katie about things, however, all the photos I took minus one - I don't consider the people passing by while you take a photo of a statue (for example) invasive or unethical. However, stepping right infront of them and throwing a flash in their face is something different.
Faye Daniels
2020-02-14 20:27:33 +0000 UTC
