"It’s Time for a Domestic Terrorism Law," blares a Washington Monthly headline. "Tucson Police Helping Homeless with New Outreach Program," reports Tucson, Arizona’s ABC affiliate KGUN9. "Programs that monitor students' social media are seen as a means of heading off the next tragic shooting," says an article in GovTech. "How the Department of Defense could help win the war on climate change," explains Politico.
In the United States, it seems no matter what crisis emerges - the planet warming due to fossil extraction, QAnon white nationalists storm Capitol, mass shooting, substance abuse crisis, a surge in homelessness - the response from our pundit, think tank, and political classes is always, almost without exception, to frame the response in terms that empower, embolden and - most importantly - fund preexisting carceral and militaristic responses.
To fight the scourge of white nationalism under Trump and show we are serious about our anti-racism, the solution is apparently to give more money and surveillance powers to the FBI, an organization itself drenched in white supremacy and anti-Muslim violence. To show we're serious about climate change, we must give the reins of crisis management to the Pentagon. To show we care deeply about ending homelessness and poverty or addressing mental health crises and drug abuse, we must always ensure the police remain equipped, resourced and well-funded in order to monitor and target vulnerable populations.
This "House Always Wins" ecosystem is no coincidence; it is fueled by a patchwork of perverse incentives: security state and weapons contractor-funded “bipartisan” think tanks and media outlets ready with turn-key "solutions" to every social problem that further pad the budgets of those already in power: the FBI, Pentagon, ICE, NSA, police forces, large corporations all with their own power-serving "security" and "extremist" experts ready to jump on every crises to explain why those already in power deserve even more of it.
If the most basic environmental protections are to pass, they must relate to US military preparedness." If Mars is to be explored, it's to ensure the United States’s primacy over China and Russia. If there's an outcry for mental health services for unhoused people, police budgets surge to cover "training" and community outreach.
On this episode, we explore how, under our regime of austerity, the house always wins; namely, how the security state is, by design, enriched at the expense of much needed programs and infrastructure like education, housing, and healthcare - with media all too eager to convince us the solution is to instead simply further bloat the budgets of police departments, border patrol, federal surveillance and law enforcement.
Our guest is University of Illinois-Chicago professor Nicole Nguyen.
***
Nicole Nguyen is Associate Professor of Educational Policy Studies at the University of Illinois-Chicago. Her research focuses on the intersections of national security and public schooling. She is the author of Suspect Communities: Anti-Muslim Racism and the Domestic War on Terror and recently co-authored, with Yazan Zahzah, Why Treating White Supremacy as Domestic Terrorism Won ’t Work and How to Not Fall for It: A Toolkit for Social Justice Advocates.
****
'Anti-Riot' Measures Open a Wide Door to Censorship
David Voorman | March 9, 2021 | Newsweek
Five reasons to be wary of a new domestic terrorism law
Brian Michael Jenkins | February 23, 2021 | The Hill
Republicans Respond to Black Lives Matter with Anti-Protest Bills
Sophie Quinton | February 4, 2021 | Stateline
To See the Danger of a Domestic “War on Terror,” Look No Further Than This Florida Case
Branko Marcetic | January 29, 2021 | Jacobin
State Legislatures Make “Unprecedented” Push On Anti-Protest Bills
Alleen Brown and Akela Lacy | January 21, 2021 | The Intercept
157 Civil Rights Organizations Oppose a New Domestic Terrorism Charge
January 19, 2021 | Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights
Why We Don’t Need a New Domestic Terror Law
Eli Massey | January 19, 2021 | Current Affairs
Here Are 4 Better Responses to the Capitol Riot Than Expanding “Domestic Terror” Crackdowns
Branko Marcetic | January 15, 2021 | Jacobin
The Capitol Riot Was Bad Enough. New Domestic Terrorism Legislation Would Make It Even Worse
Chip Gibbons | January 12, 2021 | Jacobin
We Should Be Very Worried About Joe Biden’s “Domestic Terrorism” Bill
Luke Savage | January 12, 2021 | Jacobin
We Don’t Need New Terror Laws to Defeat the Far Right
Branko Marcetic | January 11, 2021 | Jacobin
Domestic Terrorism: A More Urgent Threat, but Weaker Laws
Sebastian Rotella | January 7, 2021 | ProPublica
Fear Of A Black Homeland: The Strange Tale of he FBI’s Fictional “Black Identity Extremism” Movement
Alice Speri | March 23, 2019 | The Intercept
Why New Laws Aren’t Needed to Take Domestic Terrorism More Seriously
Michael German | December 14, 2018 | Brennan Center For Justice
Law Enforcement Has Quietly Backed Anti-Protest Bills in at Least 8 States Since Trump’s Election
Simon Davis-Cohen and Sarah Lazare | April 16, 2018 | In These Times
International Center for Non-Profit Law
Lawmakers mull domestic terrorism statute in wake of Jan. 6 attack
Rebecca Beitsch | February 4, 2021 | The Hill
Domestic terrorism is a national problem. It should also be a federal crime.
Richard B. Zabel | February 2, 2021 | The Washington Post
*****
For a full transcript of this episode, go here.
******
ACAB
2021-03-15 01:23:22 +0000 UTCDylan Thompson
2021-03-14 01:41:44 +0000 UTCJosh Watkins
2021-03-10 20:35:13 +0000 UTCMikhail Komarov
2021-03-10 17:03:50 +0000 UTC