SamSuka
citationsneededpodcast
citationsneededpodcast

patreon


Ep 150: How Economic Jargon and Cliches Make Cruel, Anti-Poor Policies Sound Sterile and Science-y (Part I)

“Supply and demand.” “It’s just Econ 101.” “Most economists agree...” “There’s always trade offs.”

Over and over, media and policymakers spew the same tired recitations meant to convey the seemingly natural, immutable laws of economics. "The economy," we’re told, is thriving when business owners and job creators are making record profits, and failing when investments in social programs have simply grown too high — and that’s the way it is and will, and should, always be.

These terms, phrases and sentiments are part of a lexicon of economic euphemisms, cliches, and other forms of business-school speak designed to blur class lines and convince us that our economic system — entirely a result of policy choices largely designed to further enrich the wealthy at any the expense of the broader welfare — is a function of cold, hard science, with rules and principles no more pliable than those of physics or chemistry.

But why should we be expected to just accept that a news report that “the economy” is on the upswing means the average worker is doing any better, when all evidence is to the contrary? Why should our media’s economic so-called “experts” come from a pool of elite economics departments beholden to corporate donors and right-wing think tanks? And why must “the economy” be defined in terms of whether the Dow is up or down, instead of whether people have food, housing, healthcare, and job security?

On this episode, part one of a two-part series, we examine the first five of our ten most popular clichés, jargon, and rhetorical thingamajigs that economists, economic reporters, and pundits use to sanitize, obscure, and provide a thin gloss of Science-ism to what is little more than power-flattering, cruel, racist, austerity ideology.

Our guest is writer Hadas Thier.

***

Guest

Hadas Thier is a writer, journalist and activist based in Brooklyn, New York. A staff writer at Jacobin, she is also the author of A People's Guide to Capitalism: An Introduction to Marxist Economics.

****

Show Notes

Vox and the False Consensus of ‘Most Economists Agree’

Adam Johnson | March 31, 2016 | Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)

The Leading Indicators: A Short History of the Numbers That Rule Our World

Zachary Karabell | 2014 | Simon & Schuster

Don't Buy It: The Trouble with Talking Nonsense about the Economy

Anat Shenker-Osorio | 2012 | PublicAffairs

Americans Are Flush With Cash and Jobs. They Also Think the Economy Is Awful.

Neil Irwin | November 6, 2021 | The New York Times

U.S. Billionaire Wealth Surged by 70 Percent, or $2.1 Trillion, During Pandemic.

Chuck Collins | October 18, 2021 | Institute for Policy Studies

Ten Years After Occupy, We Have a Left That Matters

Hadas Thier | October 16, 2012 | Jacobin

How the Right Won a Postwar Counterrevolution in Economics

Luke Savage with Marshall Steinbaum | February 8, 2021 | Jacobin

There’s No Such Thing as “Crony Capitalism” — It’s Capitalism You Can’t Stand

Joe Duncan | August 13, 2020 | Flux Magazine

‘Crony capitalism’ is just capitalism

Eric Murphy | April 11, 2012 I The Minnesota Daily

Markets in the Next System

Jesse A. Myerson | January 21, 2016 | The Next System Project

The Invention Of 'The Economy'

Jacob Goldstein | February 28, 2014 | WNYC / NPR

*****

Transcript

For a full transcript of this episode, go here.

******

Ep 150: How Economic Jargon and Cliches Make Cruel, Anti-Poor Policies Sound Sterile and Science-y (Part I)

Comments

Thank you for your usual thorough analysis, it is greatly appreciated. I enjoyed your take on Vox.Com too, they are toxically dishonest and disingenuous, plus do the smarmy, condescending Status Quo promotion you talk about. I recently read this Baffler article from 2016 that notes how Vox promotes issues (school privatization, not regulating the Cable or financial industries, etc.) that are directly favorable to the bottom line of their corporate sponsors, incl. ComCast, Bill & Melinda's Foundation, Goldman-Sachs, etc. Very openly sleazy!! Link to the article for those interested at https://thebaffler.com/salvos/explanation-for-what-johnson

Mark Schneider

There are many of us

Alex

Who are you and what are you doing with my name?

Nima slowing down and attempting to pronounce my username really got me there 😌👌

ArachnoCinnamondycalist

This was excellent, as always. I appreciate when you guys delve into topics like economics presentation in media. Do you have any interest in pulling in some academic het economists for a discussion, too? I see Marshall Steinbaum in the show notes--word on the street is if you say his name three times in the mirror he'll show up for an interview on your podcast.

Alex

Omg, great ep. Nima was really relishing his sarcastic read-alouds in this one.

Evan


More Creators