SamSuka
citationsneededpodcast
citationsneededpodcast

patreon


Ep. 162: How the "Data-Driven" Label Sanitizes Cruel Austerity Politics

"Follow The Data" is the name of a Bloomberg Philanthropies podcast that debuted 2016. "How Data Analysis Is Driving Policing," a 2018 NPR headline read. "Data suggests that schools might be one of the least risky kinds of institutions to reopen," an opinion piece in The Washington Post told us in the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Over the last 20 or so years, a trend of labeling concepts as "data-driven" emerged. It applied, and continues to apply, to policies affecting everything from education to public health, policing to journalism. Decisions affecting these areas will be more thoughtful, the idea goes, when informed and supported by data. In many ways, this has been a welcome development: The idea that a rigorously scientific collection of information via surveys, observation, and other methods would make policies and media stronger seems unimpeachable.

But this isn’t always the case. While gathering "data" is a potentially beneficial process, the process alone isn't inherently good, and is too often used to obscure important and requisite value-based or moral questions, assert contested ideological priors and traffic in right-wing austerity premises backed by monied interests. When our media tell us a largely unpopular, billionaire-backed idea like school privatization, "targeted" policing, or tax incentive handouts to corporations have merit they’re backed by "the data," what purpose does this framing serve? Where does the data come from? Who is funding the data gathering? What data are we choosing to care about and, most important of all, what data are we choosing to ignore?

On this episode, we look at the development of the push to make everything data-driven, examining who defines what counts as "data," which forces shape its sourcing and collection, and how the fetishization of "data" as something that exists outside and separate from politics is more often than not, less a methodology for determining truth and more a branding exercise for neoliberal ideological production and reproduction.

Our guests are epidemiologists Abigail Cartus and Justin Feldman.

**

Guests

Abigail Cartus, Ph.D, MPH, is an epidemiologist at Brown University. She focuses on perinatal health and overdose prevention in her work at The People, Place & Health Collective, a Brown School of Public Health research laboratory.

Justin Feldman, Ph.D, Sc.D, (@feldman_epi) is an epidemiologist and a Health and Human Rights Fellow at the Harvard FXB Center for Health and Human Rights.

***

Show Notes

Motivated Reasoning: Emily Oster’s COVID Narratives and the Attack on Public Education

Justin Feldman and Abigail Cartus | March 22, 2022 | Protean Magazine

Needed: More Curiosity, Less Phony Objectivity

John Warner | January 26, 2022 | Inside Higher Ed

Teachers and Their Unions Are Demanding Truly Safe Schools Reopening — Not “Ignoring Science” 

Seth J. Prins, Justin Feldman and Abigail Cartus | February 19, 2021 | Jacobin

How Economist Emily Oster Ended Up at the Center of the Fight Over Schools Reopening

Tessa Stuart | March 4, 2021 | Rolling Stone

Education Reformers Are Waging a War on Play 

Nora De La Cour | March 29, 2022 | Jacobin

Reading the riots – community conversations 

July 3, 2012 | The Guardian

Diane Ravitch’s new education book — an excerpt 

Valerie Strauss | September 18, 2013 | The Washington Post

How Data Analysis Is Driving Policing 

Martin Kaste | June 25, 2018 | All Things Considered (NPR)

What if Everything You Know About Murder Rates and Policing Is Wrong? 

Samantha Michaels | October 21, 2021 | Mother Jones

America’s Faulty Perception of Crime Rates

Lauren Brooke-Eisen and Oliver Roeder | March 16, 2015 | Brennan Center for Justice

Data journalism solves big problems, but it’s an organizational mess. A new tool from the AP aims to fix that. 

Ren LaForme | September 17, 2019 | Poynter

Boosting local news with data journalism and automation

Nicholas Diakopoulos | January 31, 2019 | Columbia Journalism Review

Florence Nightingale is a Design Hero

RJ Andrews | July 15, 2019 | Nightingale

W.E.B. Du Bois’ Visionary Infographics Come Together for the First Time in Full Color

Jackie Mansky | November 15, 2018 | Smithsonian Magazine

How data journalism is different from what we’ve always done

Samantha Sunne | March 9, 2016 | American Press Institute

****

Transcript

For a full transcript of this episode, go here.

*****

Merch

Don't forget, the Citations Needed merch store is now open! Continue to support the show by picking up a t-shirt, tank top, sweatshirt, tote or coffee mug for yourself or your favorite Citations fan.

******

Ep. 162: How the "Data-Driven" Label Sanitizes Cruel Austerity Politics

Comments

Brilliant. I'm a little late to this one but it's even more gripping and insightful than I even expected

V K

I work with data in, as another commenter put it, my capitalist job. It's just the very ordinary sales and shipping type information any company uses to check up on itself. I've been tasked to bring order to a level of chaos that is years in the making and utterly impossible to describe - the result of a bunch of different people making their own datasets and reports without any oversight and then subsequent people taking over without really understanding what they were looking at and adding more complexity. My role is data governance and I'm supposed to be riding herd on the data analysts, and the last 8 months of this has made me really think about this a lot. The number one thing that surprises me about the data analysts I work with, and all the users really, is the lack of curiosity. People aren't looking to understand but to complete a task. And second, it is so easy to make really simple and really horrible mistakes. And it's really hard to explain to people why such a mistake matters. "The cost you are using changes every day; it's not an accurate record of the cost at the time you did cycle count." "I'm not interested in making changes to the report." - real conversation I had about a data issue. It doesn't matter that much if some VP doesn't want to listen about whether his cycle count cost reports are right, but it has given me such a different perspective on this stuff when it's used for other stuff. Sometimes it's super not obvious. I spent a week trying to figure out why a forecast number wasn't working the way it looked like it should be working, and it was because the way the calendar was written and the way the business intelligence software language worked interacted in a way that what it looked like the calculation was doing wasn't what the calculation was doing and so the forecast was bullshit, and always had been. But it took spending about 40 hours of my time tearing my hair out trying to figure out what was wrong to see it. And that only happened because I was trying to recreate the report and couldn't get it to give me the same numbers. Which is why it's so so so scary that we have incurious, over confident data analysts deciding people's lives and futures based on bad collection, modeling, analysis, reporting and understanding of data that often isn't relevant to begin with.

Deborah Bell

Excellent episode again. Irish Twitter was and is awash with 'data' supplied by economists in service of the 'get back to work' cohort in the midst of Covid. They also constantly work for the propagation of a narrative that dictates that housing/homelessness problems are only solvable by capitulating entirely to the interests of developers, meaning that standards and regulations should be done away with. They prove their points via graphs and 'studies' with provenance as dubious as that referred to in this episode.

Ciaran Colley

I remember an early data-driven austerity program that IBM was involved with Edit: Datarade is better Edit2: In an episode about laundering ideological conclusions in ostensibly data-driven trappings, I would have expected a little more self-awareness when committing the same basic offense -- and a little more humbleness with respect to the epistemological limitations which regularly make fools of all of us. Edit3: I don't think the way the guests were applying the Precautionary Principle really stands to scrutiny. Related: https://twitter.com/WesPegden/status/1506662420462321672/photo/1

greg

I am profoundly disappointed in you, Mr. Johnson. You didn't say this was a "spiritual successor" to one of your previous episodes! What even is Citations Needed episode if not a spiritual successor to other episodes!?

newdarkcloud

fixed, thank you!

Citations Needed

Good stuff, looking forward to listening. Heads up the "go Here" at the bottom link for transcript is broken. Sorry, i work QA in my capitalist job and can't turn it off. Cheers comrades.


More Creators