Soft or strong?
Added 2021-09-09 07:30:01 +0000 UTCIn search for my Saudek wall...
At the end of this sequence, I decided to make something different.
I love the softness of a woman’s body, and I try to convey the idea of this softness without an openly sexual approach.
I asked Linda to squeeze one cheek with her hand, digging in the flesh with the nails, and she did a good job!
After that I showed her the pictures and she said it was “forte”, strong.
Actually it is much stronger than the one I have published elsewhere, and I prefer it.
The action in itself is not sexual at all, but the result is still erotic in an undefined way.
I also enclose the other picture in this post for you to compare, which of the two do you prefer?
Comments
love it!!!!!
qymp
2021-11-05 10:18:42 +0000 UTCGoldilocks. Given the horns of an either/or dilemma, gore the Kierkegaard. Which is a head-fake and a feint to go outside the box; and quicker than the reactive gaard, drive right up the center so as to stuff, dunk, go for goal or touch(fairy)down like Goldilocks who, unlike Linda, pulled her cheeks up around her ears and slept 'til the bares came home... or was that sheets she pulled up around her ears?
Scott Keith Ellington
2021-09-21 12:39:17 +0000 UTC
