Mescaline on the table.
Added 2019-11-15 08:31:00 +0000 UTCThis Contax Zeiss 85 mm 2.8 is so good, I'm not sure I need to buy the 1.4 version... but it is tempting!
Just finished editing the entire shooting with Mescaline and have secured it in various storage equipment.
It is hard work, but also fun!
Next I'm working on the second shooting with Shinrin, and I have some beautiful material also there, actually, I'm working on these last pictures at full size JPEG files, so you might detect an even better detail quality than usual.
Comments
Yes, and I’m not sure I’ll be using such a shallow DoF, not for nudes anyway, as this will blur some paramount points of interest. And it is useless to spend so much more for that lens just to stop it down every time I use it...
Bramley Apple
2019-11-16 09:20:15 +0000 UTCThe 1.4 version is indeed tempting with 4 times as much light as the 2.8 but the depth of field at maximum aperture is so shallow.
Proginor
2019-11-16 08:44:30 +0000 UTCLovely girl and amazingly expressive eyes. Very mesmerizing.
Michael Edwards
2019-11-15 14:12:46 +0000 UTCAmazing!!!!
natureman
2019-11-15 13:44:30 +0000 UTCI don't remember having said anything against the white table... Actually it is the best combination, albeit uncomfortable for the models! Worst combination would be a soft sofa of a dark color, because part of the model sinks inside the cushion and no light is reflected in the private parts. Only problem with this table was I had to take my polo shirt off at the end of the shooting to clean away any trace mescaline might have left on the shiny surface ;)
Bramley Apple
2019-11-15 10:04:47 +0000 UTCI see that you have used again the table. You were dubious about it (something to do with light reflection), but I find it a good idea. Here the light is reflected between Mescaline legs and I don't object to that :)
tmpforum
2019-11-15 09:29:04 +0000 UTC
