FIRST TIME WATCHING: Madame Web
Added 2024-03-28 16:00:08 +0000 UTCOh boy here we go! This one was...interesting.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts in the comments! As always, thank you for your support here on Patreon! Take care and stay golden. :)
LINK: https://youtu.be/J-J_MGE-v-E
Original Movie: Madame Web
Comments
I tried to watch this early on, but couldn't. First because I wasn't going to fork over $20+ to watch, then again when it was little less. I had some Amazon credit so now it was "free". I just want to say, in case one of the other comments didn't (I tried to read the other comments but some of them devolved into weirdly pointless arguments), there were no train apps when this movie takes place, which is 2003. Paying for things via your phone was still a huge novelty, if you even had a phone (though I did find it odd that only one of the girls had a phone, since even in 2003 I would think most teen girls would've had phones even if just for safety reasons, though payphones still existed here and there.)
Troy B.
2024-08-10 01:20:05 +0000 UTCThis movie was finally added to streaming today. This seems like the best way to watch this. Thankful for your sacrifice Natalie 🙂
Shaun Bloom
2024-06-29 19:30:26 +0000 UTCI am 3 months late, but I came back and watched this, in full. I was never gonna see this movie on its own, I was SO HAPPY when I saw this in the backlog when I got back on patreon. Great entertainment, the several deaths you died made me laugh so much. It's everything you said, and I'm sure a few things you didn't say. I beat you to the "Who wrote this??" by half a second that one time. Here's to many more.
Shen V
2024-06-16 23:10:07 +0000 UTCHas anyone told Nat that the Baby is Peter Parker
Daniel Casillas
2024-06-02 00:32:50 +0000 UTCI don’t think I would’ve finished this but I kept laughing at Natalie laughing at how bad this movie was so I kept going lol
John Rando
2024-04-23 11:32:15 +0000 UTCyeah if you can watch this, then we need a shrek 3 reaction, why would anyone ever waste time watching this movie
TokyoLopez
2024-04-20 00:04:34 +0000 UTC"Before you claimed that spending more money on better writers and directors would’ve made Madame Web better. Now you’re claiming it was bad CGI" Unlike you, apparently, I am capable of carrying more than one idea in my head at a time. Just because I don't express them all at once doesn't mean they aren't there. I did, however, come across a PERFECT description of YOU... "You’re an intolerant snowflake who gets irrationally offended and butthurt whenever you encounter ideas and opinions you disagree with." Yep. That's you to a T, hypocrite. Physician heal thyself.
OB-Wan222
2024-04-05 23:01:03 +0000 UTCI KNOW you believe that wasting more money on terrible movies will somehow make them better, because you’ve stated that multiple times! Before you claimed that spending more money on better writers and directors would’ve made Madame Web better. Now you’re claiming it was bad CGI. No one looked at the trailers for Madame Web and said, “The CGI looks bad, that’s why I’m not going to see Madame Web in the theatre.” What’s your next money-burning idea? “The marketing for Madame Web was bad, they should’ve spent more money on marketing and promotion!” 🙄 You’re just grasping at straws, trying to justify your delusion that wasting more money was the right move. Salespeople must see you coming from a mile off. I bet the more you pay for anything, the better you feel about it. A fool and their money… 🤣 YOU can WHINE all you want about Natalie’s honest reaction to Madame Web, hypocrite, it’s not going to change anything. It just demonstrates you’re an intolerant snowflake who gets irrationally offended and butthurt whenever you encounter ideas and opinions you disagree with. Retreat to your Facebook cave, troll.
Rod Reavern
2024-04-05 19:47:48 +0000 UTC"YOUR version of Madame Web would’ve sucked even worse, because you don’t know a thing about making movies or how movies are made." You don't know shit about what I know, boy. So let's drop the childish insults and talk facts. "Spending more money on a movie project doesn’t make it better and definitely does not make it more profitable." It's not a guarantee, but it can give the film a better chance. Part of the reason I think many people are upset with MW is one they haven't mentioned much - IT LOOKED CHEAP. It works on you sometimes without even realizing it consciously - something just looks off and it nags at you. It's uncomfortable to watch. Honestly I told a friend if it weren't a Marvel product I would have turned it off half-way through. I just watched it to be thorough. But you've got it right to lay the blame at the Studio as I have already pointed out. The Studio set this movie up to fail from the start. "You obviously FAIL to understand the reason why people subscribe to Natalie’s Patreon" Obviously you're full of shit because I'm paying to be here. But I don't like whiners. If I thought that that was all she was going to do I wouldn't be here. It's part of my reaction to a single reaction, cool your jets - Making broad assumptions on limited evidence is the first step to prejudice.
OB-Wan222
2024-04-04 16:48:43 +0000 UTCI see, you’re defending your IMAGINARY version of Madame Web, which is why you’re so pissy and defensive about it. I understand… YOUR version of Madame Web would’ve sucked even worse, because you don’t know a thing about making movies or how movies are made. Your idea to throw more money at terrible movie projects is precisely the delusional mentality that Disney, WB, and Sony has had for the past 5+ years. Spending more money on a movie project doesn’t make it better and definitely does not make it more profitable. Madame Web is a perfect example of a studio-driven project wherein a bunch of unimaginative empty suits hired a bunch of unqualified, untalented mercenaries who didn’t believe in the project, they obediently followed all of the studio’s mandates and “creative” notes, and they hacked together a movie that the studio loved on-paper, but no mainstream audience would pay to watch, never mind enjoy. As for Natalie’s “whining”, I respect her for giving her honest REACTION to an awful movie. You obviously FAIL to understand the reason why people subscribe to Natalie’s Patreon is for her full honest reactions. If you don’t like it when she dislikes a movie, TS. It’s not about you and no one cares.
Rod Reavern
2024-04-04 16:01:13 +0000 UTCI'll repeat it again for the slow learners: If you've been paying attention you would know that I have NOT been defending Madame Web in it's current form. I have been defending what Madame Web could have been. The Deadpool budget today would be equivalent to $75 million. Every once in a while you get a movie that breaks the mold - Deadpool was that. But you'll notice that Deadpool 2 was $110 million. Because the studio knew that it is VERY RARE to make a superhero movie for under $100 million that is worth a darn. My complaint about the reaction is that it is ONLY a steady stream of constant whining. It exhibits no humor or wit or insights - it's just whine, whine, whine. And I'm not a fan of that, in real life or on video.
OB-Wan222
2024-04-04 11:44:35 +0000 UTCDeadpool had a buget of 60 millions, the buget had nothing to do with piss-pour performance, shitty direction and a stupid villain. All of his line are ADR, it's not even funny by the end. If there's a characters in all Marvel universe that didn't need an Origin movie, it's Mme Web. Why are you mad at Nat for calling it how it is, a dumb, badly acted/directed movie.
Daniel Vezina
2024-04-04 00:27:45 +0000 UTCThey’re not trying to keep the license, they do that with their team up with marvel Spider-Man movies. I hated this movie but your rant is equally ridiculous
jamie jones
2024-04-02 06:10:50 +0000 UTCif you can watch this you can watch the Marvels hahaha
Chris Guerrero
2024-04-01 11:08:44 +0000 UTCThe soundtrack was my first hint that this was an early 2000s setting, and also my favourite part of the movie 😂 a waste of Scandalous by Mis-Teeq tho, they were literally just walking up to a diner… Also the fact they were watching Scream 2 in Ben’s apartment 😭 a sign for your next reaction I think 🫡😅 This movie sucks but in a way more entertaining way than Morbius imo, some of Dakota Johnson’s line readings genuinely made me laugh “But I don’t have a neuromuscular disorder?”
Daniel McGuinness
2024-04-01 01:41:17 +0000 UTCThis one made Morbius look like Endgame
saga
2024-03-31 14:17:09 +0000 UTCIf you've been paying attention you would know that I have NOT been defending Madame Web in it's current form. I have been defending what Madame Web could have been. Try reading what I actually wrote, instead of reading INTO what I wrote. And I very justly criticized nat for whining. Her entire reaction was a whine festival. She was a one-trick pony with no humor or wit. Why don't you go over to your corner of no-womans-land and I'll do my best to ignore you for the rest of my life.
OB-Wan222
2024-03-31 13:47:40 +0000 UTC" They dont care about diversity or representation, they just want the money." So in other words - they're a typical business.
OB-Wan222
2024-03-31 13:44:32 +0000 UTCYour desperate attempt to ist-aphobe me just proves how utterly incapable you are of refuting my points. You can’t deal with them, so you dismiss them. Trying to claim the moral high ground by defending Madame Web is PATHETIC. Natalie is one of the kindest “critics” in the movie reaction community and it appeared genuinely painful for her to get through this one. And YOU unjustly criticized her as “whiny”. You’re a TROLL that has been picking fights with everyone who disliked Madame Web in this comment section. You are the common denominator and outlier here. Crawl back under your bridge, troll.
Rod Reavern
2024-03-31 06:19:12 +0000 UTC... and somehow I still didnt get the point.
Kev Martin
2024-03-31 04:05:55 +0000 UTCIt is kinda ironic that (at least in my opinion) the best movies with female lead roles tend to be older. For example silence of the lambs, alien or kill bill.
KaffeeKind
2024-03-30 23:35:05 +0000 UTCThat was a lot of words. You didn't need that many.
Connor Ellis
2024-03-30 20:18:24 +0000 UTCThis will be the first reaction I watch without watching along with you. As a Cenobite fan, I get the idea behind wanting to cause great suffering. But I have to say, you're on your own with this one.
Powers209
2024-03-30 17:53:36 +0000 UTCI get it Rod - you hate women. Replace the word "woman" with the N-word in your comment and you'll see just how prejudiced you are.
OB-Wan222
2024-03-30 12:32:54 +0000 UTCIt took some fuck-head to come along and show me you can use fuck in a comment here. But try expanding your vocabulary, fuck-head.
OB-Wan222
2024-03-30 12:29:20 +0000 UTCInstead of making a good Spider Man Movie with Miles Morales to keep the license, Sony rushed this to the theatres. To think you only need to checkmark some fake ideologies and woke wash your Movie is Hollywoods biggest mistake and it costs them, Disney is a prime example. Its so sad to see them fail while they could make great movies with diverse Characters and/or female leads. They just had to make it not forced and not to obvious that all their ideologies and behaviour are all fake. They dont care about diversity or representation, they just want the money.
Curaitis
2024-03-30 11:11:07 +0000 UTCUnlikely I'll ever watch this movie as its reputation is so formidable (much like Morbius before it). Slightly tempted to watch with Nat here, but collective hate-watching has never been my cuppa tea.
Kev Martin
2024-03-30 00:06:31 +0000 UTCFinally watched this. Bafflingly terrible movie. Kinda loved it. Maybe that’s going a bit far but I had fun with it. And I also had fun trying to figure out when Natalie would finally realise that it’s a period film. I haven’t read the comments but I’m sure plenty of people have already pointed out that Ben is Uncle Ben, and the baby is Peter. I’m sure Nat would have been able to piece that together too if she didn’t forget that the movie is not set in the present day, because they weren’t exactly subtle with the hints lmao.
Razor Bikini
2024-03-29 21:28:50 +0000 UTCThe Room is totally more enjoyable to watch than this torture
RJ Films
2024-03-29 20:57:22 +0000 UTCVenom was garbage too. Thinking throwing more money at this wouldve made it better is fucking stupid. They approved the script. More money on the same script wouldve been just more expensive garbage. All more money wouldve done is pay the same people more and gave it better cgi.
jamie jones
2024-03-29 17:43:57 +0000 UTCI'm just here in the comments to see fellow patreons scream to Nat that: THAT BABY WAS PETER PARKER AND HER COWORKER WAS UNCLE BEN! 😁
LJ Mickey
2024-03-29 17:04:34 +0000 UTCMoney doesn't buy the best talent, just the most overrated and overpaid "talent". Indie movies are made with a fraction of Madame Web's budget, and some indie movies are incredible films and commercially successful. A great indie project can involve the most talented people who would cost tens of millions in a big dumb blockbuster; but they're attracted to the indie project because they recognize it's something special and are willing to do it for relatively little money, and they deliver their best effort because they're passionate about the project. No amount of money could've saved Madam Web because it was a terrible concept that was executed terribly. An all-girl superhero team-up movie doesn't work. It didn't work with The Marvels, it didn't work with Bird of Prey, and it didn't work with Ghostbusters 2016. A Harley Quinn spin-off movie might've worked. Captain Marvel 2 MIGHT have worked. A Spider-Woman movie probably would've worked if it had starred Sydney Sweeney and featured Spider-Woman in her costume for more than 30 seconds of screen time! The hacks at Columbia Pictures chose to produce an agenda-driven all-female film project featuring 4 lesser-known Spider-women characters, hired a director who had never made a feature film before, chose hack writers with a track record of failed movies, and cast actors who were either horrible, miscast, or didn't care. Madame Web was doomed to fail from its inception and no amount of money could've made it into a good movie.
Rod Reavern
2024-03-29 16:54:03 +0000 UTCYeah, people have been predicting the death of the MCU since it became clear there *was* an MCU. I'm pretty sure Avengers was going to kill it. Then Guardians of the Galaxy was way too weird and no one was going to see it. Then, okay, Guardians was huge but no way is anyone going to see something called Ant-Man. Marvel has definitely had some problems in phases 4 and 5. Part of that is that budgets for movies have gotten out of control, and there's reasons for that stretching back to the beginning of streaming services. And turns out the old leadership of Disney pushed Marvel to announce a bunch of Phase 4, 5, and 6 projects that they weren't ready to announce to try to push Disney+ subscriptions. And the current crop of movies and shows frequently don't connect to anything upcoming, so they're not driving people to the movies to see the next chapter of anything. But I could go on about what's going on with the movie industry for hours, and this is already at the "I ain't gonna read all that but I'm happy for you or sorry that happened" length. So, to sum up, the real problem facing the MCU is capitalism and the need for endless growth to appease the shareholders.
Kevin Mowery
2024-03-29 14:46:03 +0000 UTC"No amount of money could’ve saved this trainwreck." Sorry, but that is ridiculous hyperbole. Talk about being delusional. Money pays for more talented people to make the movie right from the start - better writers, better director and a more professional production that doesn't look like a soap opera. I think the concept from Sony's POV was to introduce 4 new heroes into the pantheon. The story takes place in 2005 - about the same time Peter Parker was being born. The 3 women in 2024 would be fully-grown crimefighters and part of a cadre of spider-people under the direction of an older, wiser Madame Web. That concept comes straight out of the Marvel comics. The real problem (which the budget indicates) is that Sony is trying to make superhero movies on the cheap. That may work well with animation but not for a live-action production. Budget makes the difference between a Venom ($100 million) and a Mobius ($75 million) or a Madame Web ($80 million).
OB-Wan222
2024-03-29 14:26:34 +0000 UTCThis movie's dialog is almost as cringe as The Room
Thomas Richter
2024-03-29 11:42:05 +0000 UTCIt was pretty uninteresting to watch tbh.... I dunno what they were aiming for but it sucked for me.
Ben Curran
2024-03-29 11:04:03 +0000 UTCThis movie was written by A.I
Thomas Richter
2024-03-29 10:39:59 +0000 UTCIt was a bit surreal. It was like watching an episode of a series with an 80m production
Troymk1
2024-03-29 04:27:20 +0000 UTCMan, it's wild watching an 80M dollar film not even have a basic understanding of how to write a story, the villains entire motivation is to kill the good guys because he thinks they're going to kill him, and the heroes entire motivation is to not be killed by this random guy that wants to kill them..I had a blast watching this, hardest I've laughed at a film in a while.
zak
2024-03-29 03:02:00 +0000 UTCWhy?
Inhale Burrito
2024-03-29 02:42:40 +0000 UTCYou’re delusional if you think the movie’s budget was the biggest problem with this abortion. No amount of money could’ve saved this trainwreck. The critical failure was the concept and everything afterward was doomed to fail.
Rod Reavern
2024-03-29 02:41:29 +0000 UTCThis was a trainwreck from start to finish — from the CONCEPT all the way to the marketing and promotion (Dakota Johnson’s cringey press junket interviews). I’m glad I waited for Natalie’s reaction video to watch Madam Web because I couldn’t bear to watch this abortion a second time. Based on this all-girl superhero movie and The Marvels (and Ghostbusters 2016), I’m dreading the CG animated Spider-Gwen film that has been announced, because it’s not just Gwen — which I’d love because Gwen’s prologue in Across the Spider-verse was PERFECT! No, for inexplicable reasons, it’s supposed to be another all-girl Spider team-up movie. 🤬 I don’t know what it is about these agenda-driven all-female stars, writers, director, editor, producers, etc. action movie projects, but they don’t work. I suspect that they aren’t subjected to the same scrutiny as other blockbuster movie projects, so it’s a George-Lucas’-Prequel-Trilogy situation wherein no can tell them “That idea/character/dialogue SUCKS. Scrap it and do better!” Without the usual guard rails in place, these movies crash and burn.
Rod Reavern
2024-03-29 02:19:42 +0000 UTCNatalie... you sunavabich, I'm in....
Jason Dolan
2024-03-29 01:53:45 +0000 UTCThe script was bad, the directing was bad, the post was bad. There was nothing redeeming about the movie. It wasnt even funny bad. Just downright bad.
jamie jones
2024-03-28 22:26:53 +0000 UTCEh, people will react how they're gonna react. Plus for anyone who's been watching for a bit, they knew she had this in her lol
Kelvin
2024-03-28 22:10:01 +0000 UTCI would reference a bad line to make fun of it but honestly there's almost no lines that are memorable even in that way lol. Just kind of a nothing movie
Kelvin
2024-03-28 22:09:01 +0000 UTCI just did something I thought I would never do, watch Nat's reaction without downloading the movie. There was just no way I was going to waste $20. But the reaction was pretty entertaining, even as the tedium became apparent. And you're looking at someone who loved "Damsel" and Nat's reaction to it.
Jim Lent
2024-03-28 21:39:37 +0000 UTCAll these streaming services I have and it seems like these movies she watches are never on them yet.
Chris H
2024-03-28 21:38:23 +0000 UTC1. It's PETER, Nat. PETER BENJAMIN PARKER is the baby's name. His middle name derived from his uncle BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PARKER. 2. GAWD, it's so funny how carefully they were tiptoeing around NOT saying anything close to Spiderman, Peter or even "wall-crawling". "Boy, we sure should get away from that ceiling guy, er, spider.....person." 3. I'd be SHOCKED if they threw more money away on a sequel, I mean they were openly mocking Madame Web at the Oscars this year. I know sometimes $ is the only deciding factor in these things but I'm under the impression that it lost money or at best broke even. 4. Last thing, I swear: Madame Web Pitch Meeting reaction? Maybe on your next live stream?
Keith Jacobsen
2024-03-28 21:11:36 +0000 UTCNat needs to crank up the Way-Back machine and start watching movies that have stood the test of time not just the latest Internet darling (if she hasn't seen them before). Casablanca, The Miracle Worker, The Treasure of the Sierra Madre and Hitchcock - lots of Hitchcock to name a few to consider.
OB-Wan222
2024-03-28 20:38:54 +0000 UTCFor the record, I said Nat was whining every 2 seconds, not every second. I just had to stop before my ears started bleeding. The major flaw with this film is not the script although that's pretty bad. The biggest problem is the budget of $80 million. It's pretty hard to make a good superhero film on that kind of budget which "Mobius" should have proven to the movie heads. "Madame Web" was setup for failure from the start. Which is why very quickly into the film I started wondering why it looked so much like a TV production instead of a movie.
OB-Wan222
2024-03-28 20:25:39 +0000 UTCNat, did you really not catch that her colleague was Ben Parker and his nephew, the baby who was being born this movie, was Peter Parker? As in Spiderman himself? I was waiting for you to realise but it never came. This movie was boring as hell. But I enjoyed watching it with you! It also caused me to draw something which I haven't done in a loooong while. Win-win for me.
Jules Readner
2024-03-28 19:55:46 +0000 UTCSometimes the most fun you can have with a movie is make fun OF it. I enjoyed her reaction
Jules Readner
2024-03-28 19:53:19 +0000 UTCWay to give away the ending
jamie jones
2024-03-28 19:45:46 +0000 UTCMaybe if the movie wasnt complete dogshit through every second, there wouldnt have been as much complaining.
jamie jones
2024-03-28 19:41:45 +0000 UTCGuardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3 was the 4th highest grossing film of 2023. Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania was the 10th. Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse though not directly MCU was the 6th. A $2 BILLION global total. And Deadpool & Wolverine will open as a summertime movie blockbuster. Sorry friend, but people predicting the death of the MCU are hilarious.
OB-Wan222
2024-03-28 19:03:37 +0000 UTCYeah, I wish nat would stop being overly critical and just simply enjoy movies occationally. This movie is cringe, everybody knows this going into it, but you can still have fun with it and enjoy the damn thing lol. Its okay to enjoy a bad movie and make fun of it, instead of pick it apart like it should be some Shakespeare masterpiece.
LightsCameraJake
2024-03-28 18:48:51 +0000 UTCWatching bad movies occasionally can be fun, but I didn’t think it would be the vast majority of the new movies we were gonna get. When you said you were gonna start watching more movies I thought maybe we’d finally get into more movies series, like Mission Impossible series or stuff like that. Or maybe more movies you really wanted to see but just weren’t winning polls, some more Nat executive decision movies. Didn’t think we’d be just getting bad movies all the time instead. Sorry, just kind of a bummer to me
Michael Bergeron
2024-03-28 18:47:50 +0000 UTCI agree. Even if the movie isn't the best, it still looks to be CRITICAL to the future path of the MCU.
OB-Wan222
2024-03-28 18:46:11 +0000 UTCCould you be more whiny? I tried to watch it but your obsession with constantly whining about every plot point every 2 seconds was like nails on a chalkboard. Did you ever catch on that her EMT partner was Ben Parker - does the name Ben Parker ring a bell? HINT: He's about to be an Uncle.
OB-Wan222
2024-03-28 18:41:56 +0000 UTCA suggestion for a good movie where a bunch of women take out a villain that you actually want to see die in the worst way - Death Proof!
Mastervodo
2024-03-28 18:33:34 +0000 UTCMaybe I'm just in love with Dakota Johnson too much, but was I the only one who thought the movie was not that bad lool. At the very least, I'd rather watch this than over-the-top CGI snoozefests like Black Adam haha.
Andy
2024-03-28 18:30:17 +0000 UTCI was much, much.... much much much... more entertained by the Pitch Meeting for this! But, when this movie is your material, it's super easy.
Mastervodo
2024-03-28 18:27:40 +0000 UTCShhh, all the anti-feminists will lose their minds at that suggestion. But in all seriousness nat would need to watch the ms marvel show first to fully appreciate the marvels.
jamie jones
2024-03-28 17:58:08 +0000 UTCThe Pepsi sign, I didn’t believe it when I heard it..until I had seen it for myself 😂
Victor
2024-03-28 17:56:58 +0000 UTCWatch the pitch meeting for this.
jamie jones
2024-03-28 17:50:48 +0000 UTCI'm glad this movie made it to cringe Thursdays, this really is a B rated film discuised as a, A list. This movie makes Ant Man 3 look like a masterpiece.
LightsCameraJake
2024-03-28 16:33:21 +0000 UTCDidn’t expect this lol
Joseph salazar
2024-03-28 16:28:56 +0000 UTCHi Nat, please do a reaction for The Marvels. I finally watched it last week and it's a lot of fun.
Giancarlo Ubaldino
2024-03-28 16:28:41 +0000 UTC/agree with adrian. There's so much more to watch than MCU.
Mastervodo
2024-03-28 16:28:25 +0000 UTCThe empty milk carton with the cat at the beginning broke me 🤣🤣🤣
Guillaume Brosseau
2024-03-28 16:27:09 +0000 UTCNah nah nahhhh. This movie has nothing going for it I'm not sure why they didn't table this entire project.
adrianR31
2024-03-28 16:24:53 +0000 UTCShhh those are awful. Let it go. MCU in it's current state is over.
adrianR31
2024-03-28 16:23:57 +0000 UTCAs curious about this film as I was, I think this is the only way I'd watch it. Misery is better shared than suffered alone. 😄
Tony Sanson
2024-03-28 16:19:21 +0000 UTCThat’s exactly what I was just thinking.
Blaise Uzomah
2024-03-28 16:07:52 +0000 UTCI have waited my entire life for this moment.
Razor Bikini
2024-03-28 16:06:15 +0000 UTCIf you can watch this you can watch Antman 3 and The Marvels which are way better than Madame Web
Daniel Casillas
2024-03-28 16:05:36 +0000 UTCMe when I got this alert on my phone just now https://youtu.be/SnqZBszJsko?si=eYfNFhyusdOgRBao
djKENTO
2024-03-28 16:04:41 +0000 UTCHappy Thursday Nat. Thank goodness, I mean damn! this movie is not available to stream in the UK yet, so I guess I will endure, I mean enjoy it with you some other time. Hope you're having an awesome week Nat 💛
Darryl Low
2024-03-28 16:03:39 +0000 UTC
