Planet Maldek | The Classified Truth About Mars' Origin (STRIPPED)
Added 2025-06-05 21:05:00 +0000 UTCEvidence suggests a massive world called Maldek once existed between Mars and Jupiter. This planet had a large moon that orbited it for millions of years—a moon with oceans, atmosphere, and possibly even life. When Maldek was destroyed in an ancient catastrophe, its moon was hurled into a new orbit around the sun. Today, we call that moon Mars.
This explains Mars' strange features: why half the planet looks completely different from the other half, why it has tidal bulges like a moon, and why nuclear isotopes in the soil match signatures from atomic weapons. The same pattern of destruction that claimed Mars and Venus may be heading for Earth.
Government scientists have hidden the evidence for decades. But the truth is written in planetary scars, ancient monuments, and mathematical patterns that reveal the violent history of our solar system.
Comments
5:41 Eeeeeeeeh... not so much. The Sun is this enormous fission engine that we don't relaly understand. For starters, it has this weird checkboard pattern to it where alternating areas rise and fall. It's sort of like a radioactive breathing pattern, but somehow, throughout the stunning levels of chatic forces, there's a field of sorts that is stronger, and regulates the "breathing" pattern on the surface. Solar flares are a different entitity. Solar flares are the chaotic materials, and the sun occasionally barfs portions of the molten material in to space. It's random and at an exponentilly smaller scale than the breathing. If there ever was a MASS ejection in to space, as I mentioend previously, it would simply flash fry the side of Earth that it hit, destroying it utterly, and leaving the other side of the Earth to fill in the gaps. Scientists are likely wrong about precisely how the planets formed. As I mentioned, there are three universal fores at work, that they just ignore. However, physically, they're on the right track. The spinning cloud of gas, creates energy, including gravity. The ENTIRE cloud shrinks by an order of magnitude, creating a large clump in the center. The cloud starts to spin as the atomic forces kick in. cloudy portions pile in to each other as certain parts spin faster than others. It all looks more like soup in a bowl when it's spinning than planets forming. Eventually the stuff above and below the planar disk gets sucked in to the bands where the planetoids are slowly getting heavier. Material too far away from the disk gets spun out in to what will become the Oort cloud. Eventually, the spinning bands collide with each other completely, forming huge masses of cloudy soupy material. Eventually, gravitational forces round up the material in to a distinct ball. or mostly in to a ball (rings). There you go, you have a baby star system. It's not neat and organized. It's a hot mess of fluffy nonsense that formed up exactly the way that it wanted to, not the way a bunch of stuffy nosed scientists say that it is SUPPOSED to happen. NEVER the way... :P I would like to interject that there is at least one ancient culture on Earth that says that the Asteroid Belt was an actual planet. Mars was not it's moon, though. Mars is precisely in the location where a band SHOULD have formed a planet. It belongs there. 6:30 No, Pluto IS where it belongs, it's orbit is erratic because gravity is not very strong out there. It occupies the last band where scientists theorized a planet COULD be held in to orbit. At that, there are a few other planetoids in the area. They might all have developed at the same time, but the gravitational forces from the sun were too weak to spin them around and lump them in to each other, so they formed a handful of planetoids where they DID lump up. 11:00 This is nonsense. Again, all of the existing planets are exactly where they were born in their bands that developed. It's an extremely precise formula, and they are all where they belong, excepting that a planet OUGHT to be where the Asteroid Belt is. Again, at least one ancient culture says that there used to be a planet there. Inconsistencies in planetary alignment is due to tidal forces and planetary cores shifting and pulling the planet off balance. Even the Earth is affected, with the magnetic north pole, drifting off center at about 35 miles a year.
James Long
2025-10-07 05:24:31 +0000 UTCHear me out AJ and Heckle - to prove this theory can the remote viewers do what they did for mars (talking joe who viewed them 50 million years ago) but instead remote view that huge debris field that was the planet …. Ok I’m done lol I keep going back to this episode it’s sooo good!
Chris Conlan
2025-08-22 03:39:38 +0000 UTCI loved this episode! Thank you AJ and team for exploring this topic! It’s important to explore the possibilities brought up in this episode. I would definitely watch an expanded version of this episode. Thank you!
David Parisi
2025-08-11 02:40:02 +0000 UTCWe definitely need a more drawn out episode of this!! This one has mine (and many others) minds buzzing.
SGTquig
2025-08-04 22:22:05 +0000 UTCLove it AJ. Keep it up! 💪
Redpill94
2025-07-27 05:37:16 +0000 UTCNice cool video,👍😎
Yasmell Rodriguez
2025-07-18 12:07:09 +0000 UTCExpand it! Long live Hecklefish!
Justin Horton
2025-07-04 21:36:35 +0000 UTCYes. Please make into a longer episode. Hecklefish makes every episode even better.
Dustin Ognowski
2025-06-22 17:03:17 +0000 UTCHey. Made for podcast … but we add a little broll and get it to YouTube to keep the videos on time. The biggest thing is no Hecklefish. Not everyone likes him! Crazy, we know.
The Why Files
2025-06-17 14:48:29 +0000 UTCSomeone explain stripped episode ?
RedNexican78Tv
2025-06-17 14:46:22 +0000 UTCexpand
Jay Weyant
2025-06-17 08:24:22 +0000 UTC*save the fish 🐟 *
Lance mangum
2025-06-16 19:20:01 +0000 UTCI really miss that crazy fish!
Ken
2025-06-16 19:07:33 +0000 UTC
